Best and Cheapest Pocket PC Development Bassic4PPC

Versions for windows and the pocket PC, now you can develop on the pocket PC
as well as windows, both versions use same code.

Visit www.basic4ppc.com Only $29 for both apps, complies to exe for both
windows and the pocket PC without and runtimes or runner apps.

eVC is free (thus less expensive) and more powerful (thus better, at
least for folks comfortable with C/C++). At least some of us use the
same source code for CE and "big" Windows. And we don't need runtimes
for either.



On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:49:54 -0700, "Scott Smith"
<scott93727@prodigy.net> wrote:

>Best and Cheapest Pocket PC Development Bassic4PPC
>
>Versions for windows and the pocket PC, now you can develop on the pocket PC
>as well as windows, both versions use same code.
>
>Visit www.basic4ppc.com Only $29 for both apps, complies to exe for both
>windows and the pocket PC without and runtimes or runner apps.
>
>
>
>
>

-----------------------------------------
To reply to me, remove the underscores (_) from my email address (and please indicate which newsgroup and message).

Robert E. Zaret, eMVP
PenFact, Inc.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 478
Boston, MA 02116
www.penfact.com

<r_z_aret@pen_fact.com> wrote in message
news:8v69f2hgni4v8vsmtqfqee8410srj8i4ue@4ax.com...
> eVC is free (thus less expensive) and more powerful (thus better, at
> least for folks comfortable with C/C++). At least some of us use the
> same source code for CE and "big" Windows. And we don't need runtimes
> for either.
>


I was under the impression that WM5 (and WM2003 se) did require a download
in order to run eVC apps... Or am I mistaken and that was just the VB
version?

"xTenn" <xTennRemoveThisPart@tds.net> wrote in message
news:ODx8fs6yGHA.3512@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
> <r_z_aret@pen_fact.com> wrote in message
> news:8v69f2hgni4v8vsmtqfqee8410srj8i4ue@4ax.com...
>> eVC is free (thus less expensive) and more powerful (thus better, at
>> least for folks comfortable with C/C++). At least some of us use the
>> same source code for CE and "big" Windows. And we don't need runtimes
>> for either.
>>
>
>
> I was under the impression that WM5 (and WM2003 se) did require a download
> in order to run eVC apps... Or am I mistaken and that was just the VB
> version?
>

Now I remember - the additional files were for debugging with eVC under WM5,
not actually running.

So you can disregard the previous message.

Still, I would not suggest someone wanting an easy dev system on WM5 to
consider eVC as an "easy" way to develop, for the debugging reason.
Especially if a later version of WM5 SE (etc) drops backwards compatiblity
in some areas.

..02, FWIW